Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 27, 2018 at 15:02 comment added Graphus I have to add this though, nothing takes the place of proper joinery if absolute strength is what you want.
Mar 27, 2018 at 15:02 comment added Graphus If used in exactly the same way dowels will be much stronger and provide a much more long-lasting reinforcement because screws do not hold well driven into end grain. Although there are screws that are much better at this than others you're using 2x material which is inherently a bit weak, so dowels would be the far superior choice. Screws on the other hand can be used in pocket holes, which can speed and simplify the whole construction process.
Mar 27, 2018 at 14:43 comment added WhatEvil I think we need to know more about the context of the frame you’re building. If it’s going to be a static framework to support something then a screwed butt joint may be enough but if it’s any kind of moving object (you say “the moving frame”), be aware that screwed butt joints tend to loosen over time when moved. Also even if the frame is stationary then it depends on how it will be loaded. It seems this might be a case of an XY problem: perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=542341 - you're asking about what you think the solution might be rather than directly asking about the problem
Mar 27, 2018 at 14:28 comment added fred_dot_u Would the glued dowels be expected to have the glue fail over time, leading to the conclusion of "dowels loosen over time caused by the moving frame?" I suspect the strength difference will be related to the clamping force of the screws (with glue) compared to the clamping force applied to the doweled parts (with glue). A weak clamp on the doweled parts means weak joint. A loose screw means weak joint.
Mar 27, 2018 at 12:54 review First posts
Mar 27, 2018 at 13:20
Mar 27, 2018 at 12:50 history asked Krampenschiesser CC BY-SA 3.0