13

My understanding of modern wood glue is that, if the proper glue is used and wood surfaces are properly prepared, it will form a bond stronger than the wood itself.

Is this true? If not what are the exceptions to that statement? If so does that mean that complicated and/or elaborate mechanical joints — e.g., dovetail joints — are now more decorative than practical?

| improve this question | |
19

Indeed, when done properly, the glue is stronger than the wood itself when both of the glued faces are edge-grain or face-grain.

A few circumstances come to mind when glue alone is not stronger than the wood:

End Grain

When glue is applied to end-grain, the grain acts as little straws and draws a lot of the glue up the wood, away from the joint (similar to how the grain draws water up the tree when the tree is alive). In these cases, the majority of the glue is pulled away from the joint and (without more elaborate joinery techniques) a strong joint cannot be achieved, no matter how rough you sand or how tight your clamps are.

Joining with an end-grain face is unavoidable for 90-degree joints, such as when making boxes or drawers. This is why you'll often see dovetail or finger joints used in these cases. These joints not only provide physical limitations to how the wood can move, but also allow the glue to be applied to a greater surface area and along edge-grain faces, creating a much stronger joint.

Joining end-grain faces is also unavoidable for 180-degree joints, and a good round-up of techniques to strengthen this joint can be found at the question, How can I join two boards at the ends?

Wood Movement

There are a lot of factors that determine how a piece of wood reacts to changes in humidity or contact with water. These include the type of wood, its density and shape, the direction of the grain, and its age. Therefore, the two pieces of wood that make up the joint will often react differently to the changing environment, putting unique stresses and tension on the joint. Furthermore, the direction of the tension is often different than what is expected under typical use of the joint.

When significant changes in moisture are anticipated, glued joints can fail as the different pieces of wood react differently to the change in moisture.

| improve this answer | |
  • "...both of the glued faces are edge-grain or face-grain." I'm finding this confusing to parse, but I think you mean that they have to be the same, right? ie both edge- or both face-grain? – wrhall Apr 7 '15 at 15:15
  • 2
    @wrhall Good point; "glued faces" should probably be "glued surfaces." I think the point drs is trying to make is that the glue joint will be stronger if neither of the glued surfaces is end-grain. Anything that is not end-grain is also commonly called long-grain, and in this context the edges and faces are both long-grain surfaces. – rob♦ Apr 16 '15 at 6:12
6

In the tests performed by Matthias Wandel. He found that most glues performed equally as well. And when joints failed it was with wood coming out.

However the strongest part of wood is along the grain and grain is rarely straight. So the joint area would still be weaker than if it was a solid piece of wood.

| improve this answer | |
  • its important to note the circumstances of the test. I believe he tested these joints within hours of constructing them. That does little to test the long-term stability or strength of glued joints, which can depend on moisture, cycling (both mechanical, temperature, and humidity), and plain old age. These are much much harder questions to answer. – aaron Jan 20 '17 at 15:24
  • @aaron "I made one joint with each type of glue and let the glue set for 48 hours." aka 2 days between gluing and testing. – ratchet freak Jan 20 '17 at 15:34
  • i generally like my glued joints to last longer than 2 days :) for another perspective, see richard maquire's take on this: theenglishwoodworker.com/trust-or-reinforce – aaron Jan 23 '17 at 14:06
6

I've always been told that when you glue two boards together that the join will be stronger than the surrounding wood. This is primarily for joining boards to make a wider (or thicker) board. Long edge to long edge, and if you properly join them it seems to be true. When bending a board to break I've never seen it break along the seam. I have seen the glue fail over time and the board will split along the seam. Though this is mostly from years of seasonal movement and likely the two boards didn't move the same together.

I also tend to use my biscuit joiner to help reinforce these joints as well.

Now comparing that to dovetail joints is a very different subject. Dovetail joints help strengthen an angle. Glue doesn't do nearly as well with angles or pieces that will get a lot of stress from different angles. A corner is end-grain being attached to face grain, which already is a weaker glue joint. On top of that it will suffer more opposing stresses.

A dovetail adds physical strength from the wood itself, also give more surface area to glue. Other forms of joinery do the same thing, they are needed to hand different cross stresses and provide more strength.

| improve this answer | |
4

Glue is not a joint. For ultimate longevity of a wooden structure go with physics not chemistry.

I should have been more concise in my response to this question. I was referring to structural joinery specifically...the joinery traditionally practiced by joiners in the construction of frameworks that have to carry loads with little deflection/deformation and no chance of failure. Covered bridges come to mind, but you would find similar joints in utilitarian furniture as well. Rather than depend on the adherence ability of glue (especially over time, and especially in variable environmental conditions) joiner's configured connections between the wooden members to take advantage of woods inherent resistance to compression.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Chemistry is small-scale physics. Glue joints typically have enough surface area to increase their bond beyond what you might expect, plus soaking into the wood somewhat so it is in fact a mechanical joint as well. This presumes a proper glue joint, tight enough to bond well but not so tight that it is starved of glue. There have been many scientific studies of wood construction; the Wisconsin Forest Products Lab was one of the leaders in that area if you want to look at the evidence. – keshlam Jan 19 '17 at 16:58
  • 2
    @keshlam This is Jim Tolpin, I think he knows the way glue works :-) Oh P.S. regarding starving joints from clamp pressure, this is a non-issue in practice for the home woodworker. It is other factors that lead to starved joints, not clamping too hard. (Assuming PVA here.) – Graphus Jan 19 '17 at 17:08
  • 1
    While I certainly welcome Jim Tolpin to participate on this site, his answer, in this case is as broad as the question is. Neither the question nor the answer are very helpful for helping woodworkers address their specific problems. I hope to see more from Jim as meatier questions come up. – Ashlar♦ Jan 19 '17 at 18:20
  • 1
    @Keshlam Splitting hairs here, but it's the U.S Forest Products Laboratory that happens to be located in Madison,Wisconsin – Ast Pace Jan 20 '17 at 2:14
  • 2
    We who have been part of the Woodworking Exchange for an extended period shouldn't have let the original question stay as asked, It should have been "Is glue the best fastener for permanent joints?" This response might just as well have pointed out that a screw of a dowel or a nail is not a joint either. – Ast Pace Jan 20 '17 at 5:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.