Woodworking Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional and amateur woodworkers. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I bought a dining table and it was claimed that the table top was made from reclaimed wood from a 160-year-old Douglas Fir log. The table top is still seeping out sap. Is this even possible from something that is 160 years old? I think I'm being ripped off here.
I'd like to hear from your experience/expertise please!
The table top is still sipping out sap. Is this even possible from something that is 160 years old?
Sure, it's definitely possible. Sap doesn't just disappear from a piece of wood because it's old.
One might think that over that long of a time, the sap should have dried up a little. If it was kept in a cooler place and brought into somewhere warmer, the sap could start to flow again.
made from reclaimed-wood from a 160 years old Douglas Fir log
What I would do to "prove" this claim is look closer at the wood itself. If it's supposedly a 160-year-old log, it should be old-growth. If it's old growth Douglas fir, the growth rings should be much closer together than what you would see in new-growth wood.
For example, if you go to your local big-box lumberyard and look at a 2x4 stud, you will see very large gaps between the early- and late-wood rings, sometimes as large as 1/4"! This is because new-growth trees tend to grow very fast in their mostly treeless canopy (assuming the area they grew was clear cut), whereas old-growth trees grew very slowly in a canopy choked by other, larger trees.
It could be the 'reclaimed bit. By reclaiming the wood, one possibility is that they had to resaw the timbers to boards. It might have started out as 8" x 8" timber or some other large dimension. This is actually quite likely, and the 'new' cuts are now exposing new wood.
Even a significant planning to straighten and clean the boards could cause a similar reaction.
So just by leaking sap does not preclude it from being old wood.
However, I can't guarantee that it IS 160 yo either.
My answer is YES old wood has sap..that's what keeps me going. JK! The reason we dry kiln things is for heat.. not to dry sap particularly but to crystalize it. I understand that pine sap for instance, once 'set' to 150 degrees, will then crystallize on cool down, and will not liquify again, until reaching 151 degrees... This is why commercial dry kilns use high heat; to save on sandpaper as much as to dry wood. Wood will dry in 33 degree weather all day long.. but heat speeds the process and sets the sap. In my experience biulding four dry kilns, a data logging heat treater for fire wood, Doug fir doesn't SET well at all. It is more like it 'attenuates' the sap. We run boards through an IR oven in our flooring line at 200 degrees for about twenty seconds and sap bubbles up through the surface.. it's just what it does. The wood can be very old and still do this..I cut 300 year old trees burned in fires on my ranch and believe me, they still have sap.
I’m building a coffee table out of pine 12x12’s that I believe to be in the 200 year old range possibly much older. They were structural support beams in a building in the meat packing district of Manhattan, the building is at least 150 years old .and after cutting them to length one of them is oozing sap-pitch,it looks like I opened a pocket and out came quite a bit.
